Chelation Therapy May Modestly Reduce the Risk of Overall Cardiovascular Events in Some Patients

 

Chelation Therapy May Modestly Reduce the Risk of Overall Cardiovascular Events in Some Patients

FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. (CT) TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 2013
Media Advisory: To contact Gervasio A. Lamas, M.D., call Joanna Palmer at 305-674-2589 or email Jpalmer2@msmc.com. To contact editorial co-author Howard Bauchner, M.D., call Jann Ingmire at 312-464-2499 or email jann.ingmire@jamanetwork.org. To contact editorial author Steven E. Nissen, M.D., call Wyatt DuBois at 216-445-9946 or email duboisw@ccf.org.

CHICAGO – Although chelation therapy with the drug disodium EDTA has been used for many years with limited evidence of efficacy for the treatment of coronary disease, a randomized trial that included patients with a prior heart attack found that use of a chelation regimen modestly reduced the risk of a composite of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but the findings do not support the routine use of chelation therapy for treatment of patients who have had a heart attack, according to a study in the March 27 issue of JAMA.

Chelation therapy is an intravenous administration of chelating agents (such as disodium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid [EDTA]) to treat heavy metal toxicity. Based on favorable anecdotal and case report experience, chelation therapy has evolved in recent decades to include treatment for coronary and peripheral artery disease. “Three small clinical trials have assessed the effects of chelation on surrogate outcomes, such as walking distance in patients with claudication and time to exercise-induced ischemia in patients with coronary disease. These studies did not find any evidence of treatment efficacy but were underpowered for evaluation of clinical events,” according to background information in the article.

“As a consequence, mainstream medical organizations consider the therapeutic value of chelation for atherosclerotic vascular disease unproven and the use of this therapy potentially dangerous. Disodium EDTA, particularly when infused too rapidly, may cause hypocalcemia [abnormally low level of calcium in the blood] and death,” the authors write. Chelation therapy with disodium EDTA has been used for more than 50 years to treat atherosclerosis.

Gervasio A. Lamas, M.D., of the Columbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Fla., and colleagues conducted the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) to determine if an EDTA-based chelation regimen reduces cardiovascular events. The randomized trial enrolled 1,708 patients 50 years of age or older who had experienced a myocardial infarction (MI; heart attack) at least 6 weeks prior. Participants were recruited at 134 U.S. and Canadian sites. Enrollment began in September 2003 and follow-up took place until October 2011. Two hundred eighty-nine patients (17 percent of total; n=115 in the EDTA group and n=174 in the placebo group) withdrew consent during the trial. The median (midpoint) age was 65 years. The primary end point for the trial was a composite of total mortality, recurrent MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina. Qualifying previous heart attacks occurred a median of 4.6 years before enrollment.

Patients were randomized to receive 40 infusions of a 500-mL chelation solution (3 g of disodium EDTA, 7 g of ascorbate, B vitamins, electrolytes, procaine, and heparin) (n=839) vs. placebo (n=869) and an oral vitamin-mineral regimen vs. an oral placebo. Infusions were administered weekly for 30 weeks, followed by 10 infusions 2 to 8 weeks apart. Fifteen percent discontinued infusions (n=38 [16 percent] in the chelation group and n=41 [15 percent] in the placebo group) because of adverse events.

The researchers found that the primary end point occurred in 222 (26 percent) of the chelation group and 261 (30 percent) of the placebo group. “There was no effect on total mortality (chelation: 87 deaths [10 percent]; placebo, 93 deaths [11 percent]), but the study was not powered for this comparison. The effect of EDTA chelation on the components of the primary end point other than death was of similar magnitude as its overall effect (MI: chelation, 6 percent; placebo, 8 percent; stroke: chelation, 1.2 percent; placebo, 1.5 percent; coronary revascularization: chelation, 15 percent; placebo, 18 percent; hospitalization for angina: chelation, 1.6 percent; placebo, 2.1 percent).”

Revascularizations accounted for 45 percent of the primary end point events. The composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke occurred in 96 chelation patients (11 percent) and 113 placebo patients (13 percent).

The authors note that the study had several limitations, including an unusually high number of patients withdrawing consent.

“In stable patients with a history of MI, the use of an intravenous chelation regimen with disodium EDTA, compared with placebo, modestly reduced the risk of a composite of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, many of which were revascularization procedures. These results provide evidence to guide further research but are not sufficient to support the routine use of chelation therapy for treatment of patients who have had an MI,” the authors conclude.
(JAMA. 2013;309(12):1241-1250)

Editor’s Note: The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provided sole support for this study. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, etc.

Editorial: Evaluation of the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy - The Scientific Process, Peer Review, and Editorial Scrutiny

In an accompanying editorial, Howard Bauchner, M.D., Editor-in-Chief, JAMA, and colleagues discuss some of the concerns regarding the TACT trial and the factors involved in deciding to publish the study.

“Clinical decision making is complex, reflecting a synthesis of evidence, physician experience, and patient preference, bound together by societal norms. As such, very few studies should immediately change clinical practice but, rather, most add incremental knowledge to the complex puzzle of a clinical decision. However, based on full consideration of the strengths and limitations of TACT, the conclusion is clear and should influence practice—these findings do not support the routine use of chelation therapy as secondary prevention for patients with previous myocardial infarction and established coronary disease. Whether chelation therapy may have any role in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease remains to be determined.”
(JAMA. 2013;309(12):1291-1292)

Editorial: Concerns About Reliability in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy

Steven E. Nissen, M.D., of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, writes in an accompanying editorial that “TACT represents a situation in which many important limitations in the design and execution of a clinical trial compromise the reliability of the study and render the results difficult to interpret.”

“Nonetheless, all randomized controlled trials should be published because even failed trials provide valuable scientific lessons for the medical community. Accordingly, TACT provides useful insights into the overwhelming challenges faced when trying to determine the effectiveness of an unusual and controversial therapy.”

“Given the numerous concerns with this expensive, federally funded clinical trial, including missing data, potential investigator or patient unmasking, use of subjective end points, and intentional unblinding of the sponsor, the results cannot be accepted as reliable and do not demonstrate a benefit of chelation therapy. The findings of TACT should not be used as a justification for increased use of this controversial therapy.”
(JAMA. 2013;309(12):1293-1294)

Editor’s Note: The author has completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr. Nissen reports grants/grants pending to his institution from Lilly, the Medicines Company, Amgen, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, Vivus, Orexigen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Resverlogix.

# # #


Related Documents...

3878 VIDEO FINAL.doc : Filesize 137Kb
Video Script in Doc FormatDownload
3878 VIDEO FINAL.pdf : Filesize 96Kb
Video Script in PDF FormatDownload
3878 RADIO FINAL.doc : Filesize 60Kb
Radio Script in Doc FormatDownload
3878 RADIO FINAL.pdf : Filesize 101Kb
Radio Script in PDF FormatDownload


ON THE WEB...

Social Networks...

Facebook Myspace Twitter
LinkedIn Ning Hi5
Bebo Wordpress Blogger
Squarespace Tripod Typepad
CONTACT INFORMATION
Media Contact:

Jann Ingmire
Director of Media Relations
The JAMA Network
phone: 312.464.2499
email: jann.ingmire@jamanetwork.org

Technical Contact:

Rob Dalton
phone: 972.733.1595
email: rdalton@vnr1.com

Satellite Coordinates:

Satellite Feed Every Tuesday
9:00 - 9:15am (ET)
2:00 - 2:15pm (ET)
 
Galaxy 19
Transponder 12 C band, lower
18 mhz HD
Downlink: 3931 Horizontal
Symbol rate 12.8 FEC 3/4 QPSK
Trouble #: (312) 676-9855
 
AVAILABLE ON PATHFIRE in VNF Provider A
EACH TUESDAY AT 9 a.m. (ET)
Look for the JAMA Report Tab

MEDIA
Primary Video...


Primary JAMA Video | Length: 2:11Download SD Video
Download HD Video
Show Embed Link


Mobile Video...

Primary JAMA Video
Time: 2:11

Download for 3G
Primary JAMA Video
Time: 2:11

Download for iPhone
Related Broadcast Video...

Soundbite: Gervasio A. Lamas M.D. - Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Florida
Time: :26

Download SD Video
Download HD Video
B-Roll: Treatment added to IV
Time: :14

Download SD Video
Download HD Video
B-Roll: Examination
Time: :12

Download SD Video
Download HD Video
Related Broadcast Audio...

Full Radio News Release TRT :60

Download MP3 Audio
Download WAV Audio
Related Images...

JAMA Logo

JAMA Cover